A subjective look at smc Pentax-DA 16-45mm F/4 ED AL @ Pentax K-5. Part 3 — Summary

It is hard to say what was the purpose of Pentax Corporation when they made a decision to develop smc Pentax-DA 16-45mm F/4 ED AL (unlikely that it was designed as an alternative to a 18-55/3.5-5.6 kit lens), but I can safely say that the lens produces a good impression. Being a standard zoom lens, it is very sharp at the entire focal range, has a compact and lightweight housing with good build quality and very fast and precise autofocus.

The lens is not perfect but its drawbacks are typical for all lenses with the same or similar field of view. I mean very strong distortion at focal length of 16 mm, strong vignetting at problematic combination of focal length of 16 mm and F/4 and strong lateral chromatic aberrations at the wide end. All these aberrations can be corrected during post-processing (but not without some loss of details in the corresponding areas of the image, of course).

On the other side, the lens has no significant advantages over smc Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 AL WR: it has 2 additional mm of focal range at the widest end and constant speed 4 at the entire focal range. The main advantages of kit lens are wider focal range, just slightly worse image sharpness at the entire focal range and similar correction of optical aberrations, moreover, the kit lens is lighter, more comoact and weather-resistant. Both lenses rely on in-camera AF motor and support Quick-Shift Focus System.

In comparison with smc Pentax-DA 17-70/4 the lens almost has no advantages. Can we really talk about «advantages» in case of only 1 additional mm of focal length at the widest end, lighter housing and slightly smaller dimensions? smc Pentax-DA 17-70/4 has wider telephoto range, also shows excellent sharpness at the focal lengths of 17-40 mm and similar correction of optical aberrations, besides, it is equipped with fast and silent Supersonic Drive Motor. Both lenses support Quick-Shift Focus System and are not weather-resistant.

In comparison with smc Pentax-DA* 16-50/2.8 the only advantage of smc Pentax-DA 16-45/4 is… its affordable price (however, the lens can be only purchased in used condition because it is now discontinued). Actually these two lenses can’t be compared directly due their different categories (we are talking about fast pro grade reportage zoom lens and a slow consumer standard zoom lens).

The following table describes the basic features of the mentioned above lenses:

18-55/3.5-5.6 16-45/4 17-70/4 16-50/2.8
Announced 2009 2003 2008 2007
Elements 12 13 17 15
Groups 9 10 12 12
Special elements 1 ASPH, 1 ED 2 ASPH, 1 ED 2 ASPH 3 ASPH, 2 ED
Super Protect coating No No Front element Front and rear elements
Minimum focusing distance, m 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.30
AF motor None None SDM SDM
Internal zooming No No No No
Internal focusing No No Yes Yes
Aperture blades 6 8 7 9
Material of the housing HQ Plastic HQ Plastic HQ Plastic HQ Plastic
Material of the mount Metal Metal Metal Metal
Dust sealed No No No Yes
Moisture sealed Yes No No Yes
Weight, g 230 356 485 565
Maximum diameter, mm 69 72 75 84
Length, mm 68 92 94 99
Diameter of front filter, mm 52 67 67 77
Lens hood PH-RBA PH-RBL PH-RBM PH-RBJ
MSRP, USD 0 (w/camera) Discontinued 499.95 1049.95

The smc Pentax-DA 16-45/4 is a pretty good companion for those who are into travel photography. Being a lens with useful focal range, it is capable of shooting of architecture and landscapes, however the final images should be post-processed for correction of optical aberrations. As for the interior photography without tripod, it is difficult with this lens due to its slow speed. The lens also does not produce impressive background blur at focal length of 45mm and F/4 therefore I recommend to get a fast prime lens for portrait photography or bokeh photography, fortunately the choice of such lenses in the Pentax lineup is wide enough, especially if you won’t limit yourself only with lenses which are now in production. The same advice goes for the low-light photography.

Author of the review and photos: Evgeny Artemov, eugene.artemov@mail.ru

Pier, Cebu City, Cebu Island, Philippines
Chinese Cemetary, Manila, Luson Island, Philippines
Beach at Siquijor Island, Philippines
Tarsier, Bohol Island, Philippines
Negros Island, Philippines
<< Optical Results

Your comment

Being unregistered user or not logged in user you won't get any email notifications about replies on this comment.

Copy this code

and paste it here *